Monday, March 1, 2010

"RedRedRooster"

.

Continued from:
HuffPost's protection of the most egregious violators of its "policies" --- and its banning of non-violators --- often on a minute-to-minute basis

Summary: In mid-February 2010, a Huff-Watch operative observed that HuffPost was permitting a user, "woodpecker4," to "spam" (repeatedly post) anti-Semitic comments on all its top news threads (regardless of the topic), claiming that that Sec. of State Clinton is "a Zionist warmonger...who takes her orders from AIPAC... and wants to fight wars for Israel." Both spamming, and religious slurs, are violations of HuffPost's (supposed) comment policy --- yet HuffPost was reviewing, approving and deciding to publish all of "woodpecker4's" rants.

On February 15, our operative
established a new account as "RedRedRooster," in order to confront "woodpecker4." Among other comments, "RedRedRooster" asked him to provide proof of his conspiracy theories.

HuffPost banned "RedRedRooster" within minutes of this request
--- but left "woodpecker4" free to continue spamming, which is exactly what he did.


============

February 15, 2010: "woodpecker4's" comment archive at 10:50 am --- filled with anti-Semitic conspiracy theories:


15Feb Woodpecker profile 1050a - all Zionist crap -



February 15, 2010: "RedRedRooster's" confronts "woodpecker4," requests evidence of conspiracy:


"RedRedRooster's" comment archive at 10:20am:


15Feb RedRedRooster profile 1020a - calling out Woodpecker -


"RedRedRooster" left for work. At 6:24 pm he returned, to find that HuffPost had banned him...



... but left "woodpecker4" free to continue:


... which is exactly what he did over at least the next seven days. The following screencaps are from Feb 23:


And here's "woodpecker4's" comment archive from February 23, showing the almost nonstop anti-Semitic conspiracy theories that HuffPost was reviewing, approving and deciding to publish:


23Feb Woodpecker profile 330p - all Zionist crap -



Return to:

HuffPost's protection of the most egregious violators of its "policies" --- and its banning of non-violators --- often on a minute-to-minute basis

.

No comments:

Post a Comment