Showing posts with label Blood libels. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blood libels. Show all posts

Saturday, November 24, 2012

Is HuffPost even more anti-Israel than the Iranian regime is? Yes – and here's the proof.

.
Background: Over the past thirty days, we, The Algemeiner, and our friends at HuffPostMonitor have been documenting and exposing the fact that HuffPost --- the world's #1 most-read online "newspaper" --- has been enabling the "host-producer" of its video "news" programming, Ahmed Shihab-Eldin, to spread inflammatory lies and propaganda against Israel, over and over and over and over again.  This is not surprising, since Shihab-Eldin is also a former "host-producer" for Al Jazeera*, an outfit that is almost as anti-Israel as HuffPost.
[*Reminder: Al Jazeera threw a birthday party (video) for the Islamist terrorist who smashed a 4-year-old Jewish girl's skull to pieces, after murdering her father in front of her, to ensure that that would be the last image she'd ever see.]





On November 23, HuffPost stooped to an entirely new low --- and revealed itself as being actually more anti-Israel than Iran.


HuffPost did this by enabling Shihab-Eldin to use a grisly photo of children's corpses to post an extremely inflammatory lie about (a) the nature of Israel's Operation Pillar of Defense, and (b) the number of Palestinian children killed during this campaign --- citing figures that even Iranian propaganda (and the Palestinians themselves) reveal is a lie.


It began with this innocuous-appearing story, which appeared near the top of HuffPost's "World" page, and later, on its front page:

"Fascinating Images From Gaza's Border"

On that page is one of HuffPost's infamous "slide shows," which often reveal nothing but the heart-wrenching photos of dead and (supposedly) injured Palestinians, but rarely if ever pictures of the Jewish victims of Islamist savagery. 


Amidst
HuffPost's predictable Palestinian "bloody-shirt-waving," it published this heart-wrenching photo, of children's corpses in a morgue ---

captioned with a blood libel against Israel:



Note that the caption beside the photo reads:

"Over half of the victims of the Israeli aggression were children."  

Although HuffPost "credits" this photo and/or allegation to someone named "Mosa'ab Elshamy," it was HuffPost itself that decided to allow Shihab-Eldin to post it.  How do we know?  Because he signed this blood libel himself:







Let's examine and debunk each part of HuffPost's latest blood libel against Israel, individually:


(1) "Operation Pillar of Defense" was not Israeli "aggression," as HuffPost knows well, it was a defensive action to stop Hamas and allied groups from firing nearly a thousand rockets, missiles and mortars into its civilian population centers.   


Of course, if one only relies upon HuffPost for one's news, he or she would not know that --- because as we documented here, HuffPost refused to publish a single story on its front page or Wolrd page about the incoming fire coming from Gaza.  Instead, HuffPost began to publish stories about this conflict only when Israel began threatening to take strong defensive action to put a stop to it --- which, of course, HuffPost framed as "aggression."  This is just one more of HuffPost's pathological efforts to incite hate against Israel and Jews on false grounds, and (2) to protect militant Islamists from being held to public account for their threats and violent actions against them.


(2) HuffPost knows (or should know) that children constituted a very small percentage of those killed in Israel's defensive campaign, which was initiated for one purpose: to stop Hamas's and allied groups' deliberate attempts to murder Jewish civilians. 

How do we know that HuffPost's 50% number is wildly inflated?  Would Iran's official propaganda "newspaper" be sufficient? Here's the front page of the Tehran Times from Nov. 21 --- two days before HuffPost enabled Shihab-Eldin to post this lie:


According to Iran --- the murderous regime that supplies weaponry, funding and jihadist motivation to Hamas and Hezbollah --- only 27 out of 126 "victims" in Gaza were children.  For the math-challenged elites at HuffPost, that is 21%.  


Furthermore, as anyone who pays attention to Gaza knows full well, even that 21% is highly misleading, because Hamas and allied groups are notorious for:

  • Posting phony pictures of dead children that were actually killed by its own misfired rockets and missiles, or were killed elsewhere, such as in the Syrian civil war.
  • Claiming that "children" include teenage males who, in one moment, were helping to fire rockets and missiles into Israel, or otherwise engaging in terrorism, yet when the "news" cameras come by, they revert back to "civilian" status --- which HuffPost dutifully promotes, as perhaps painting peace signs on a wall.
To be clear: Every child's death amidst a military conflict is a tragedy, no matter which side causes this to occur.  But in this conflict, one side openly admits to, and celebrates its use of children as human shields, while the other is working valiantly to protect children from harm --- even those of the enemy. 

Reasonable, informed, honest people know the difference.  HuffPost, however, has decided to engage in nauseating PR for the savages, as we have documented over and over again, since this latest conflict started:




The inestimable Melanie Phillips put this madness into context, on Nov. 22 --- one day before HuffPost published that inflammatory lie


An excerpt from this article:

Blood libel against the most moral army in the world 

The most startling fact about Israel’s performance in the eight days’ war in Gaza is the one about which the most egregious lie is being told by western commentators. This is the astoundingly low proportion of Palestinian civilian casualties. 


According to the IDF spokesman last evening , 177 Palestinians were killed in Operation Pillar of Defence, of whom 120 were ‘engaged in terrorist activity’.


That total is a tiny number of deaths from 1500 air strikes. It also means 57 civilians were killed along with the 120 terrorists. That is a ratio of more than two terrorists for every civilian killed. When you consider that in Afghanistan the ratio was three civilians for every one combatant killed, and in Iraq it was four civilians for every one combatant killed, you can see just what a staggering feat of precision the Israelis achieved. This is even more astonishing given that the Hamas situated their rockets and ammunitions in the middle of civilian areas.


This precision was acknowledged yesterday by American journalist Anderson Cooper, who was interviewed by Wolf Blitzer of CNN after Cooper arrived in Israel from Gaza. Acknowledging that some people would disagree, Cooper said that it was very clear that the IDF clearly knew exactly what it was targeting. Palestinians knew it, too, he said: some of them would go outside to watch and even photograph the attacks, because they knew they were not either the targets or the object of indiscriminate fire. The bottom line was that the Israelis were making clear efforts to hit only military targets.




How does this all compare to Arianna's claims that HuffPost is a professional "newspaper," and better than its competitors? 

"[At HuffPost] there are guidelines that have to be followed -- and they include a prohibition on... inflammatory claims."
- Arianna Huffington, February 1, 2010

“[T]oo many reporters have forgotten that the highest calling of journalists is to ferret out the truth, consequences be damned.”
- Arianna Huffington, July 29, 2008

“We are aiming to go beyond just facts, to create a narrative... [W]e think bringing journalism to a new level is exactly what people are looking for.”
- Arianna Huffington, October 20, 2009





ACTION ITEMS

If you believe HuffPost should stop doing PR for Hamas and other Islamist terror groups, and inciting hatred against Israel and Jews, we urge you to do these things:

(1) Make your voice known to HuffPost's senior management here.

(2) Consider writing or calling one or more of HuffPost's top advertisers, to let them know your thoughts on what their ad dollars are enabling.
An easy way to approach this is to scan our easy-to-use directory and find one or two corporations that you are a customer of, or have stock in. Your concerns will automatically be given considerably more weight. Also, request a follow-up after they've had a chance to review the evidence; don't let them off the hook, or sweep this under the rug. 
(3) Forward the link to this story along to others who support Jews and Israel --- particularly journalists!!!

(4) Email this article to your Congressional representatives --- along with the following "NO HUFFPOST" graphic, and tell them to post it in the windows of their offices,
to show that that they will no longer enable or legitimize the West's #1 facilitator of the cyber-jihad against Israel, Jews and the U.S. military



.

Thursday, November 22, 2012

HuffPost omits Hamas celebrating, justifying bus bombing from source AP story; more

.
Summary: 

  • Starting at 5:30am, and by 8:00am EST on Nov. 21, newspapers and blogs that use AP as primary source published top-line stories of Tel Aviv bus bombing that included the Hamas official's praise and justification of this terror act.
    .
  • HuffPost's version of the AP story, however, which it did not make a headline, omitted the Hamas official's praise and justification, and falsely claimed Hamas had made no official statement about the incident.
    .
  • These are not isolated incidents or "accidents," but rather, are part of HuffPost's continuous pattern of protecting Hamas and effectively doing its PR --- while giving top-line, enduring coverage to stories containing inflammatory accusations against Israel and Jews that it knows (or should know) are untrue




Background


Shortly after 5:00am EST, news broke from Tel Aviv of a civilian bus bombing that occurred directly across from IDF headquarters.  At latest count, at least 27 people were injured, several severely.  Hamas made an official statement to the AP, praising and justifying the attack, which it reported in its story, written by Ariel David, minutes later:

While Hamas did not take responsibility for the attack, it praised the bombing.

"We consider it a natural response to the occupation crimes and the ongoing massacres against civilians in the Gaza Strip," Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum told The Associated Press.

At 5:33am, the National Post (Canada) posted the original version of the AP story as its splash, which included Hamas praising the attack in the headline:
Hamas praises attack after bomb rips through Tel Aviv bus, but doesn’t take credit

And in the body of the National Post article (again, published at 5:33am):


The other big news bureau, Reuters, also ran the story at 8:12am, with Hamas's praise for, and celebration of the attack in the headline:


By 8:00am, many other news sites and blogs, small and large, reported the AP story as-is, or reported other sources who had documented Hamas praising the attack, and even threatening more, including CNN, Fox News and Legal Insurrection (click to see screencaps).  





HuffPost ran the AP story --- but not as the headline, and edited out the part about Hamas praising and justifying the attack


The AP is the bureau upon which HuffPost most often relies for its raw news content.  In addition to being the world's #1 most-read online "newspaper," HuffPost also has a larger news room than the New York Times.  It has all the assets to root out every one of the most obscure stories it featured on its front page today, including:


You get the idea:
HuffPost has hundreds of researchers, editors and journalists who scour world news, 24-7, up to the second, every day.  There is no possible way that HuffPost was unaware of (a) the bus bombing, and (b) the fact that Hamas was praising and celebrating it.  Yet here is how
the self-proclaimed "nonpartisan newspaper" decided to play this story:

(1) From the time the bus bombing story broke (5:14am EST) to after 10:00am EST, HuffPost decided it was not newsworthy enough to merit its top headline.  It didn't make the story its top headline until around 10:20am.

(2) Until around 1:00pm, HuffPost's version of the AP story falsely claimed "There was no official comment from Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad."  And even after HuffPost updated the story, around 1:00pm, to include Hamas's praise and justification, it never changed the headline --- nor did it post a separate story focusing on this fact.  
(3) This is part of HuffPost's continuing pattern of ignoring Hamas's threatening, then taking credit for and celebrating terrorist attacks on Jewish civilians --- yet giving front-page coverage to what it knows are proof-less allegations against Israel and Jews.
(4) As HuffPostMonitor pointed out, HuffPost's headline generically described a "bus explosion" --- as if this bus just magically exploded, without any cause.  This is part of HuffPost's continuing pattern of ascribing no human involvement in attacks on Jews --- when those attacks are perpetrated by Palestinians. 
Here is the proof that validates all of these allegations.




(1) From the time the bus bombing story broke (5:14am EST) to after 10:00am EST, HuffPost decided it was not newsworthy enough to merit its top headline.


This screencap was taken at 8:16am.  Instead of running the bus bombing story as its top headline as soon as it broke, HuffPost decided that a two-day-old story designed to whip up more hate against conservative activist Grover Norquist should remain the blaring headline:




It wasn't until after 10:00am --- 5 hours after HuffPost became aware of the bus bombing --- that it decided to make the story its top headline:



Note the subhead: "Bus explodes in Tel Aviv, injuring 10."  While this might be an appropriate initial statement, the fact is that by the time HuffPost published this headline, it knew (or should have known) that this was no mere "explosion" --- it was a bombing. 


HuffPost's story page was no better (screencap taken at 9:01am)






(2) Until around 1:00pm, HuffPost's version of the AP story falsely claimed "There was no official comment from Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad."


I found the bus bombing story at HuffPost at around 8:15am, and noticed immediately that unlike the other versions of the story being reported, HuffPost's version not only didn't feature Hamas's statements in the headline (or a separate story), it actually denied there were any official statements. 


I began taking screencaps of the story page at 8:15am.  This screencap was taken at 10:00am --- note the copy in the last sentence:

"There was no official comment from Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad." 

At 10:44am, having not found a single reference on HuffPost to the fact that Hamas had praised and celebrated this bombing, I did a search on the the spokesman's name: Fawzi Barhoum. HuffPost's own search engine confirmed that it had no mention of Hamas's spokesman on this day:


Why would HuffPost omit Hamas's praise for and celebration of the bombing from the story?

Only HuffPost's senior management can answer that question.  You might ask them.  If they refuse to answer, you might pose the question to HuffPost's advertisers, whose money makes this madness possible (except in the case of Cadillac, which is using our tax money to enable HuffPost).




(3) This is part of HuffPost's continuing pattern of ignoring Hamas's threatening, then taking credit for and celebrating terrorist attacks on Jewish civilians --- yet giving front-page coverage to what it knows are proof-less allegations against Israel and Jews.


Examples of HuffPost ignoring Hamas threats, celebrations, etc.


From Nov 17, Hamas officials claimed:

“We (Hamas) have missed suicide attacks. Wait for us soon in the bus stations and cafes.” 

As documented here, HuffPost completely ignored this shocking statement --- and instead continued focusing all of its efforts on depicting Israel as the aggressor in the Gaza conflict.


As documented here, in March 2011, when the Fogel family --- including their three-month-old baby --- were slaughtered in their home by Palestinians, HuffPost completely ignored the fact that Hamas and Palestinians were caught on camera openly celebrating, and taking credit for the grisly attack. See "Fogel family slaughter, evidence file," section 4.


As documented here, in December 2010, HuffPost completely ignored all of Hamas's recent terror attacks and genocidal threats against Israel and Jews in general... yet published on its front page what it claimed was Hamas's "commitment to truce with Israel":

  
Whereas HuffPost ignores Hamas's outrageous threats and acts against Jews, it applies the exact opposite treatment to accusations against Jews and Israel that it knows (or has reason to know) are untrue, or severely decontextualized.

For example, on Nov. 18, HuffPost published as its splash headline, "Sharon's Son: 'Flatten All Of Gaza'." Why does Ariel Sharon's opinion merit any attention --- especially since HuffPost's own story acknowledges that he has zero policy role --- that his occupation is "manag(ing) his family’s farm in Israel"?




From our archives:

  • When al-Jazeera --- one of the world's most notorious pro-terrorist propaganda networks --- posted a totally unverifiable smear, alleging that Israeli guards "humiliated" a female detainee --- HuffPost ran it right on its front page, not knowing whether it was PallyWood propaganda (Links to detailed stories, from left to right: 1, 2, 3)
  • "Outrageous Statements": HuffPost periodically runs items on its front page alluding to "outrageous statements" by Israeli officials and religious figures. (Link)

    Yet HuffPost pathologically ignores, and has never run a comparable analysis of "outrageous statements" by Hamas or other radical Islamist terror groups --- which tend to include genocidal threats.
    (Link; more, more)




Then, there was the August 2009 story that HuffPost published on its front page, entitled "Swedish Article Suggests Israeli Troops Kill Palestinians, Harvest Organs."

The Reality: This "news" story was false on a multitude of levels.

Why HuffPost knew, or should have known the story was false/misleading: First, the story itself revealed that the "reporter" admitted he had "no idea, no clue" if the allegations in his "story" are true. Turns out the Palestinian family at the root of the story denied making these claims --- and basic fact-checking reveals that what is alleged is medically impossible.

Did HuffPost's crack team of 53 "editors" fail to do any basic fact-checking into this age-old blood libel against Jews --- or did they ignore what they found? Whichever was the case, it didn't prevent them from matching this inflammatory claim with a picture of grinning Israeli soldiers, marching towards the photographer --- as if they're proud of committing the barbarity that the Swedish "article" (and HuffPost) accused them of.


This false "news" story incited a torrent of hate-filled user comments against Israel and Jews, which HuffPost reviewed, approved and decided to publish.
See complete documentation of this incident here.

More:

Archive of anti-Israel, ant-Semitic bias, libels and hate at HuffPost
Has Arianna been lying since 2005 about HuffPost's bias, and mission? It seems so.

The Stimulus And The (Approved) Response: Anti-Semitism and Israel-Hatred on Huffington Post





(4) As HuffPostMonitor pointed out, HuffPost's headline generically described a "bus explosion" --- as if this bus just magically exploded, without any cause.  
This is part of HuffPost's continuing pattern of ascribing no human involvement in attacks on Jews --- when those attacks are perpetrated by Palestinians. 


For example, as documented here, in 2009, when a Palestinian used an ax to murder a 16 year old Jewish boy in Israel, and maim his younger friend, HuffPost claimed only that this was an "ax attack" --- as if axes, like buses, can magically hurt Jews without any human interference.





 

UPDATES

(1) HuffPost updated the story at about 1:00pm to include the full, unedited version, including Hamas praising and celebrating the attack.


(2) But HuffPost completely removed the story from its front page – so one would never know the reality, if they relied only upon HuffPost for its news. How do we know it removed the story? Because we took a full-page JPG of the front page.


(3) HuffPost also completely ignored the recorded evidence of Hamas openly celebrating the bus bombing, and stating, “God willing, we will be seeing black body bags.” GatewayPundit, a one-man blog, posted the story at 1:13pm.  As of this writing (8:00am, Nov. 22), HuffPost has still not published this story.









How does this all compare to Arianna's claims that HuffPost is a professional "newspaper," and better than its competitors?

"If you're going to produce great journalism, you have to build a team of people who are working together and driving toward the same goals editorially.”
– Arianna Huffington, April 7, 2011 --- two months after being put in control of all of AOL's "news" and "content"

"AOL's acquisition of HuffPost has allowed us... to continue to change the culture here."
--- Tim Armstrong, Chairman, AOL, the genius who bought HuffPost and put Arianna in charge of all "news" and "content" --- May 14, 2011

“[T]oo many reporters have forgotten that the highest calling of journalists is to ferret out the truth, consequences be damned.”
- Arianna Huffington, July 29, 2008

“We are aiming to go beyond just facts, to create a narrative... [W]e think bringing journalism to a new level is exactly what people are looking for.”
- Arianna Huffington, October 20, 2009





ACTION ITEMS

If you believe HuffPost should stop protecting and doing PR for Hamas and other Islamist terror groups, and inciting hatred against Israel and Jews, we urge you to do three things:

(1) Make your voice known to HuffPost's senior management here.

(2) Consider writing or calling one or more of HuffPost's top advertisers, to let them know your thoughts on what their ad dollars are enabling.
An easy way to approach this is to scan our easy-to-use directory and find one or two corporations that you are a customer of, or have stock in. Your concerns will automatically be given considerably more weight. Also, request a follow-up after they've had a chance to review the evidence; don't let them off the hook, or sweep this under the rug. 
(3) Forward the link to this story along to others who support Jews and Israel --- particularly journalists!!!


.





Friday, November 16, 2012

HuffPost enables torrent of anti-Semitic user comments in response to its incitement against Israel

.
.

THEN: HuffPost-incited and -approved hate comments against Israel and Jews during 2008's Operation Cast Lead

In 2008, during Israel's last major defensive action against savage terrorists in Gaza (Operation Cast Lead), HuffPost employed continuous bias and incitement of hate against Israel and Jews, depicting them as merciless aggressors who were deliberately targeting and murdering poor Palestinians, including women and children, with indiscriminate fire.  In response to this incitement, HuffPost reviewed, approved and decided to publish thousands of extremely anti-Semitic user comments --- even though its policy claims that it doesn't allow, and will not publish such comments.  A sampling:

Usman
Time to Ki** your Isr**li friends! Third Intifada!
Posted 10:09 PM on 12/27/2008
[screencap; user was banned, but got up to at least 265 comments here, here]
 

JeffRenseRadio
A great time is capturing a jpiggie, taking his beanie and wiping my a$$ with it, then cramming that and his zionaiz star of david flag down his jpiggie throat...
Posted 06:39 AM on 12/29/2008
[screencap]


markoze
They all need to be rounded up and gassed
Posted 05:03 AM on 12/30/2008
[screencap; user account is active, but HuffPost removed all comments, here]
RoyLewis
There is a new name for America. Its called the Jewnited States of America... They control the media, the FED, most of the banks...
Posted 02:05 PM on 01/04/2009
[screencap]
Several months later (June 2009), Columbia professor Lincoln Mitchell claimed that based on his and his friends' observations, on nearly every HuffPost news story concerning international issues -- regardless of the topic --- it usually takes no more than ten comments before users are finding a way to blame Jews.  Again, the only reason those comments appeared is because as Arianna Huffington affirmed in July 2008, the only comments that appear on the site are those that it has reviewed, approved and decided to publish.

Read more in our first major report: The Stimulus And The (Approved) Response: Anti-Semitism and Israel-Hatred on Huffington Post, and in our comprehensive archive of HuffPost's Cast Lead incitement --- and the response, here and here.

 


NOW: HuffPost-incited and -approved hate comments against Israel and Jews during Operation Pillar of Defense


As we've been documenting over the past few days (1, 2), HuffPost has once again decided to (a) protect Hamas, (b) perpetrate "Pallywood" propaganda, and (c) falsely depict Israel as the aggressor in this conflict. And predictably, in response to its latest anti-Semitic, anti-Israel bias and incitement, HuffPost also enabled its rabid leftist haters to unleash a new torrent of hate comments. 


Note below that as HuffPost (Arianna Huffington) has publicly affirmed in numerous public venues, not a single user comment appears anywhere on her site without first being reviewed and approved.  Proof - on this thread, 436 comments were awaiting moderation:




Below is a sampling of the types of anti-Semitic hate comments that HuffPost reviewed, approved and decided to publish in the past few days, in response to its latest incitement.  Note the consistency: Jews are the problem; Jews own the U.S. Congress and control our government, etc.; Jews are Nazi-like aggressors, attacking poor, defenseless Palestinians, etc. 


As you review these hate comments, you might ask yourself: how many do you think are coming from the estimated 250,000 unique monthly HuffPost users (2011 data) who reside in countries that act as incubators of Islamist terror --- Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Pakistan?  How many are from the leftist neo-Nazis who frequent HuffPost?








ACTION ITEMS

If you share our view that HuffPost's actions in regards to this story are outrageous, and are opposed to its long, long history of inciting and tolerating anti-Semitic and anti-Israel hatred, we urge you to do three things:

(1) Make your voice known to HuffPost's senior management here

(2) Consider writing or calling one or more of HuffPost's top advertisers, to let them know your thoughts on what their ad dollars are enabling.
An easy way to approach this is to scan our easy-to-use directory and find one or two corporations that you are a customer of, or have stock in. Your concerns will automatically be given considerably more weight. Also, request a follow-up after they've had a chance to review the evidence; don't let them off the hook, or sweep this under the rug.

(3) Forward the link to this story along to others who support Israel and Jews
.
.


Monday, May 17, 2010

5/13/10: HuffPost publishes another incendiary libel against the U.S. military (user hate-fest erupts: HuffPost: "Approved!!!")

.
Summary: Is the U.S. military really conducting systematic battlefield executions of Muslims in Afghanistan whom they know, or suspect are not Taliban --- but don't want to release? Of course not.

So why did HuffPost publish such an allegation, when the source of the story -- who's known for his false claims and conspiracy theories --- had not even a shred of proof upon which to base it? Especially when HuffPost claims that it explicitly prohibits conspiracy theories?

This is not an isolated incident, but merely the latest in a stream of smears and blood libels against the U.S. military that
that HuffPost has chosen to publish, even when it had reason to know that they were false or grievously decontextualized (1, 2, 3).

This all would not be so dangerous were it not for the fact that HuffPost
is the #1 blog on Earth, has an estimated 135,000 unique visitors per month from Iran and Pakistan (see Section 4.3 here), and is now one of America's top ten news sites. We at HUFF-WATCH are extremely concerned that HuffPost's malicious actions are going to result in one or more of our soldiers being injured or killed.

If you share our concerns, please see "(3) Action Item" in Part 2, to make your voice known --- or go directly here.


On May 13, 2010, HuffPost published an original story by its "World Editor,"
Nicholas Sabloff, which uncritically quoted Seymour Hersh's allegation that U.S. troops are carrying out systematic "battlefield executions" in Afghanistan. And as you can see below (note the scroll bar on right), HuffPost positioned this inflammatory story near the very top of its front page:
WATCH: Seymour Hersh Says US Troops Carrying Out 'Battlefield Executions' In Afghanistan



======================

Upon what evidence does Hersh base this
incendiary, libelous conspiracy theory against the U.S. military?

======================

Well, Hersh has no evidence whatsoever --- as is proven in the article itself. So what is the basis of his allegations? Here's Hersh's explanation (emphasis added):
What they've done in the field now is, they tell the troops, you have to make a determination within a day or two or so whether or not the prisoners you have, the detainees, are Taliban. You must extract whatever tactical intelligence you can get, as opposed to strategic, long-range intelligence, immediately. And if you cannot conclude they're Taliban, you must turn them free. What it means is, and I've been told this anecdotally by five or six different people, battlefield executions are taking place. Well, if they can't prove they're Taliban, bam. If we don't do it ourselves, we turn them over to the nearby Afghan troops and by the time we walk three feet the bullets are flying. And that's going on now.

That's it.
That's the entire basis of Hersh's allegations: Unnamed sources who may or may not exist, and who may or may not be telling the truth. And it was upon that basis, of no substance, that HuffPost chose to run this story, as one of its top-line news items.

What would a responsible "Internet newspaper" have done? It would never have let this libel against our soldiers see the light of day. In recognition of American soldiers' honor and distinction, HuffPost would never give as much as one pixel of coverage to such a vicious, unproven smear against them --- especially one that could serve to incite more instances of "sudden jihad syndrome" (discussed below).


Wait... hasn't HuffPost claimed it prohibits inflammatory claims and conspiracy theories?


Yes it does. Here's Arianna Huffington, co-founder and Editor-in-Chief of HuffPost, explaining her site's journalistic virtues and mission:

"[At HuffPost] there are guidelines that have to be followed -- and they include a prohibition on conspiracy theories and inflammatory claims..."
- Feb. 1, 2010

“[T]oo many reporters have forgotten that the highest calling of journalists is to ferret out the truth, consequences be damned...
- July 29, 2008

“[W]e are increasingly seen ... as an Internet newspaper, not positioned ideologically in terms of how we cover the news.”
- May 22, 2009

And as reported by Gawker on March 9, 2010, HuffPost claims:
"[Our] editorial policy, laid out in our blogger guidelines, prohibits the promotion and promulgation of conspiracy theories."

As has been meticulously documented here at HUFF-WATCH, there are three groups against which HuffPost is perfectly willing to publish the most inflammatory claims and conspiracy theories --- even with no evidence, or that the evidence contradicts: the U.S. military, conservative groups and individuals, and Israel and Jews.

And regarding inept editing and journalistic standards, here's how one of HuffPost's top "reporters," Jason Linkins,
lashed out (justifiably) at another "Internet newspaper" just a few months ago:
In short, the facts Corsi obtained torpedo the premise of his piece, which, I remind you, is that the "shooter advised [the] Obama transition." Were this being written for a responsible journalistic entity, some creature called an "editor" would have stepped in and said, "Hey, Jerome, you realize that by your own findings, you article is complete horseshit, right?" But this is World Net Daily, written by and for complete charlatans.


======================

So what was knowable about Seymour Hersh at the time HuffPost made the decision to publish his baseless smear against the U.S. military?

======================

Is this the first time Hersh proved to make wild accusations without a shred of proof, or to twist and deny the truth? Well, as the Hertz commercials go...
not exactly:
[After denying it, facts now show] Sy Hersh did claim Cheney ran “an executive assassination ring"
- Hot Air, May 19, 2009

Sy Hersh Says It’s Okay to Lie (Just Not in Print)
- New York Magazine, May 21, 2005

"The Iranian regimes apparent nuclear ambitions and its demonstrated support for terrorist organizations is a global challenge that deserves much more serious treatment than Seymour Hersh provides in the New Yorker article titled The Coming Wars. Mr. Hersh's article is so riddled with errors of fundamental fact that the credibility of his entire piece is destroyed."
- U.S. Department of Defense press release, January 17, 2005

"Hersh's Israel-bashing is so egregious it gives yellow journalism a bad name."
- Jerusalem Post, March 6, 1992

"Former Attorney General John Mitchell, a major source for Hersh's book 'The Price of Power,' said that 'almost every episode or statement on Kissinger ascribed to him by Hersh [was] a distortion, an exaggeration, a misinterpretation, or an expletive-deleted lie'."
- National Review, June 24, 1983

At this point, a few more questions arise:
  • Is it even possible that Nicholas Sabloff, HuffPost's "World Editor," who wrote this "news" story, didn't know of Hersh's history? That's pretty unlikely, being that he is a graduate of the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. Or is "Fact-Checking 101" no longer part of the requirements for graduation?

  • Is there any conceivable way that HuffPost's crack team of 52 other editors could not have known all this, if it had done even the most basic fact-checking, prior to or after seeing this inflammatory headline?

Perhaps someday, someone in a position of influence will ask HuffPost to answer these questions --- especially given how it has repeatedly
claimed to be a nonpartisan source of "news." Perhaps they will also ask HuffPost why it has a pattern of smearing the U.S. military on bogus grounds...


======================

Is this the first time HuffPost has decided to smear the U.S. military?
No.


======================

Rather than being an isolated incident, however, this is merely the latest example of HuffPost's pattern of publishing incendiary libels against the U.S. military, which it should have known, or had reason to know, are untrue:
4/5/10: HuffPost falsely smears the U.S. military, again; User hate-fest erupts (HuffPost: "Approved!!!")
In this incident, HuffPost uncritically published blaring headlines claiming that the U.S. military engages in "collateral murder." Yet even after numerous sources --- including Stephen Colbert, whom it covers on a regular basis --- debunked these allegations, HuffPost refused to even acknowledge those who rose to the defense of our soldiers, against this smear. It then allowed users to engage in a hate-fest of libels against our soldiers.

5/4/09: The HuffPost-alJazeera alliance: Fomenting (and approving) anti-U.S. military, anti-Christian propaganda, hate and libels
HuffPost uncritically published an al-Jazeera generated story, implying that the U.S. military was distributing bibles to American soldiers in Afghanistan, with orders to proselytize to civilians. Turns out that one American church sent bibles to a soldier in Afghanistan --- and when the military found out about it, intervened before a single bible could be distributed. HuffPost also allowed a hate-fest to erupt among readers, against our soldiers, Christianity, and America in general.

SPECIAL REPORT: HuffPost's Protection Of Blood Libels Against The U.S. Military
HuffPost knowingly enabled and protected an egregious violator of its policies to repeatedly post phony pictures on all its top news threads, allegedly showing American soldiers sexually torturing Muslim women and children, which he claimed is a matter of their "standard operating procedure." When a HUFF-WATCH operative attempted to expose these photos as fakes --- using facts and hard evidence --- HuffPost repeatedly blocked his comments, then banned him. Most recently, HuffPost made the anti-U.S. military propagandist an official "Community Moderator," in charge of policing other users' comments.


Here are some more articles that document HuffPost's pattern of bias against, and disrespecting the U.S. military:
4/15/10: U.S. military contractor deaths surge; users erupt in hate-fest (HuffPost: "Approved!!!")

4/8/10: Captured by the Taliban --- and dissed by HuffPost

12/30/09: CIA officers murdered in Afghanistan; users erupt with hate and libels (HuffPost: "Approved!!!")


9/4/09: HuffPost essentially tells dead Marine's family, "F*&$ off, we're using your son's dying picture as our headline, over your objections"


======================

What kind of readership and influence does HuffPost have?
A lot --- of both.


======================

Some casual political observers say, "Oh, who even reads HuffPost, or believes anything it says?" and, "HuffPost is a blog --- not a 'news' operation!"

The facts, which many find both surprising and disturbing, are that:

Given these facts, regardless of how one feels about it, HuffPost has clearly become a powerful, influential part of both the "news" media and the political blogosphere.



==========

Continue to Part 2 of this article to read:
(1) Why HuffPost's actions against the U.S. military may end up getting American soldiers killed --- if it hasn't already

(2) So what kinds of user comments did HuffPost review, approve and decide to publish, in response to this incitement?

(3) Action item: How to make your voice known


.