"FeignedIndifference"

.

Continued from:

HuffPost's protection of the most egregious violators of its "policies" --- and its banning of non-violators --- often on a minute-to-minute basis

"FeignedIndifference" was a user who, according to his/her comment archive, registered a HuffPost account sometime in early July 2009.

This conservative user dared to express political views that challenged and mocked those espoused by HuffPost's resident "gang" of pathological, egregious, long-term violators of its (supposed) Comment Policy or Terms of Service. In particular, "FeignedIndifference" challenged "BlueStateMan," one of HuffPost's longest-term radical leftists, whom it has enabled and protected since 2005; summary here; detailed analysis here).

It is for this reason that a Huff-Watch observer noted "FeignedIndifference," and captured several PDFs of his/her comment archive.

The following is the PDF of the last comments by "FeignedIndifference," who got up to 414 posts before HuffPost banned him/her (as opposed to the many thousands that HuffPost permits its most egregious violators to amass).

See if you can detect anything that would fall outside of HuffPost's (supposed) Comment Policy or Terms of Service that would merit his/her banning (especially given what it tolerates from the radical leftists whom it has allowed to rack up tens of thousands of egregiously-abusive comments, and has enabled and protected for years; see here):


Yet look at what happened to "FeignedIndifference" shortly after he/she posted the above comments, sometime on July 7-8, 2009:

HuffPost banned "FeignedIndifference," and (to our knowledge) he/she was never seen or heard from again.

Yet as is documented in extensive detail here, while HuffPost was banning users like "FeignedIndifference," it was enabling, emboldening and protecting users whom it knew were pathologically, egregiously and continuously violating its policies. (This even includes "kevenseven," whom HuffPost knows has been interviewed in his home by the U.S. Secret Service for his threats and urgings of violence against its protectees; see summary here and detailed analysis here).

Return to:

HuffPost's protection of the most egregious violators of its "policies" --- and its banning of non-violators --- often on a minute-to-minute basis

.